Search for: "Bell v. Bell*" Results 2621 - 2640 of 4,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2020, 10:00 am by Jennifer Dalven
If that rings a bell, it’s because not even four years ago the Supreme Court struck down an identical Texas law in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:53 pm by admin
It is no longer acceptable to chastise women for failing to behave as demure, quiet, submissive, needlessly supplicant, sugary-sweet belles. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 10:16 am
The Court also concluded that, even if the PCIGC were an "insurer," and the penalties were part of the "covered claim," it was immune from the assessment of late-payment penalties under the provisions of Section 9-314(a) of the Insurance Article and Section 5-412 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article.The court's official headnote adequately captures the substance of the majority opinion, but in dissent, Judge Wilner (joined by Cheif Judge Robert Bell)… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:45 pm by Adam Thierer
Ryan Radia brought to my attention this excellent Slate piece by Vaughan Bell entitled, “Don’t Touch That Dial! [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 8:00 pm by Emilie Paquin-Holmested
Applying the rule established by the Supreme Court of Canada in Farber v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65; Mylan… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:44 pm
Case Name: Jacobs Ranch Coal Co. v. [read post]