Search for: "Call v. State"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 55,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 3:01 am
It is now styled as Florida Workers' Advocates v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:35 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:32 am
The issue at the center of Maryland v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court's opinion in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:07 pm
Div. 2004), Port Authority v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:30 pm
The police were called and Ms. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:18 pm
In a legal dispute (Aurora S.A. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm
Furthermore, Hall says his suspension was in response to what he called “a sarcastic, humorous and satirical post…Republicans vote Nov 8—Democrats vote Nov 9th. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:03 pm
This confirms that the trend I noted with full-year, state-total data in this post last year, that there was a shift in the relative rates after Realignment and Proposition 47, but since then California has tracked the trend of the rest of the country, though at its new, higher level.For violent crimes, the California cities in the sample had essentially no change, a drop of 0.6%, while the comparable cities in the rest of the country enjoyed a continuing decline of 4.9%.Once again, the… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:09 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:43 am
Recently, in McNeill v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Compulife Software, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am
We may see an considerable increase in so called “empty rates” liabilities. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
The “state secrets” cases are General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:43 am
The complaint calls these statements false and misleading and says Cardone had “no reasonable basis” for making these representations to investors. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:25 pm
That was the case in State of Missouri v. [read post]
