Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 14,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
This is an area where, as Chief Justice Roberts wrote famously, “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
” At Notice and Comment, David Rubinstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram discuss United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:16 pm
United States, May 18, 2015, 9-0. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court endorsed the unenumerated principle in the appropriately named case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 4:54 am
” Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for Emeric Bozso On March 11, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:01 pm
The issue in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 17 (1933), under state or local law. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:55 pm
At 2pm ET on November 9, 2009, Chief Justice John Roberts gaveled the session to a close announcing that the case had now been submitted. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
"Waiter, There's a Gavel in My Soup": Yesterday at the "City Room" blog of The New York Times, Gay Talese had a post that begins, "My writer friend Sidney Offit and I were dining at Lumi's on 70th Street and Lexington Avenue on Saturday night with our mutual friend, the enduringly beautiful 78-year-old model Carmen Dell'Orefice; and seated next to our table, quietly engaged in conversation with his wife, Jane, while sipping red wine, was the chief… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:56 am
Chief Justice Hughes’ opinion for the Court stated that Section 4 was “confirmatory of a fundamental principle” about the “integrity of the public obligations. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:25 pm
Roberts engaged in a rare series of questions reflecting controlled frustration and disbelief at arguments from one of his former law clerks—representing the United States—that the State department did not have enough information to say what the court should do in the case Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:45 pm
'” On June 26, 2013, a divided Court in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Thanks.This post includes a draft of the next chapter of Part III (Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making) -- Chapter 14 (The State and the People; Popular Referenda). [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 1:22 pm
I believe that a simple letter directed to the Business Law Section, communicating that such action may be in violation of United States Supreme Court precedent, would have sufficed. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
It is true that Chief Justice Roger B. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:08 am
” — Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Court in Riley v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:09 am
launch a thousand law review articles:The thoughtful opinions written by THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by JUSTICE GINSBURG have persuaded me that current decisions by state legislatures, by the Congress of the United States, and by this Court to retain the death penalty as a part of our law are the product of habit and inattention rather than an acceptable deliberative process that weighs the costs and risks of administering that penalty against its… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm
Unfortunately, the United States Supreme Court did not agree with this reasoning. [read post]
