Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 48,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm
It's true that the prevailing party is normally entitled to costs. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:09 am
Regina (Conservative and Unionist Party) v Election Commissioner [2010] EWCA Civ 1332; [2010] WLR (D) 296 “It was not open to a petitioner to an election court to seek an order for costs under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 against the respondent’s political party and its local party association who had not been parties to the petition. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
In Stahl v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 7:11 am
Circuit granted rehearing en banc in Halbig v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:46 pm
However, in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
Pelipenko v Russia 16/1/14 We reported the ECtHR’s decision on the merits here. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
Pelipenko v Russia 16/1/14 We reported the ECtHR’s decision on the merits here. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:00 am
Appeals Professions: Costs Against Lawyers Personally Québec (Criminal and Penal Prosecutions) v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:19 am
Guadiana v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:00 am
Water Dist. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:01 am
According to the SCOTUS Blog, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Marx v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:57 am
In French v Groupama Insurance Company Ltd (Groupama) [2011] EWCA Civ 1119, the Court of Appeal found that a settlement offer made in a letter from Groupama to French dated 15 February 2007 did not comply with either the previous or current requirements of CPR Part 36 (a procedure allowing parties to make settlement offers which if not accepted have certain costs consequences should the principal sum awarded by the Court be higher or lower than the sum offered). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:12 am
Tweet Tags: class actions, discrimination law, Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:51 am
Circuit misapplied the Supreme Court's Holland v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:30 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:08 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench) CA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2278 (QB) (10 September 2010) High Court (Family Division) Coventry City Council v X, Y and Z (Care Proceedings: Costs: Identification of Local Authority) [2010] EWHC B22 (Fam) (27 September 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 11:11 am
In Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 12:23 pm
& Subs. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 11:01 am
Utah (1974) [Jim Beck, Drug & Device Law] Related on China Agri-Tech v. [read post]
