Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 2621 - 2640 of 8,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire:  Petition of State of New Hampshire v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:59 am by John Summers and Michael Newman
In fact, under the full measure, the Roberts Court reversal rate held to a steady 56% (56.4% over OT2005-2010 v. 57.1% for OT2011.) 2. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:38 pm by Daniel Nazer
This test, from a California Supreme Court case called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:49 am by Breakstone, White & Gluck
Two days prior to this, however, on July 26, 2010, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided the case of Papadopoulos v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the jury may find otherwise.The case is Grenawalt v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
“Where that is not the bona fide or genuine purpose of the communications, the privilege does not protect the communications”, see Bercovitch v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm by Howard Knopf
However, it should be noted that that the Board’s “correctness” niche carved out by the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) pre-Vavilov wherein some issues arise both in tariff hearings and in infringement proceedings in the superior Courts may one day now be revisited as to whether this is still “good law”. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
Superior CourtDoes a court commissioner, acting without the consent of the parties, have authority to summarily deny a petition for writ of habeas corpus or a petition for writ of mandate? [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Ronald Collins
Question: As a historical matter, how does the Supreme Court’s 7-1 ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm by Will Aitchison
Wal-Mart challenged the judgment by appealing to the Superior Court. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Three months later, a federal bankruptcy court ruled that the McDaniels' purchase money lien on the property was superior to the preexisting lien. [read post]