Search for: "Does 1 - 10"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 43,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Illinois: At Chicago City Hall, the Legislative Branch Rarely Does Much LegislatingProPublica – Mick Dumke | Published: 2/25/2019 From 2011 through 2018, Chicago Ald. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:47 am
The board in arriving at this conclusion does not deviate from G 1/10 (see point 3).1. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 6:15 am
What significance, if any, does the scope of the car leasing business have, and the leasing period? [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:11 pm
” Id. at *3.Holdings[1] The language of the claims in this case does not contextually define “inert to light. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
What if the return on that technology was $400:$1--for every $1 of government program money spent, the return in cost savings was $400? [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 3:02 pm
Rule 13d-1(c) - provides that Schedule G can be filed, in lieu of filing Schedule D, within 10 days of the date which the 5% threshold was exceeded if: (i) generally the person has not acquired the securities with any purpose, or with the effect of, changing or influencing the control of the issuer; (ii) the person is not a certain enumerated person; and (iii) the person does not directly or indirectly own 20% or more of the class of equity securities. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 2:19 am
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.6. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 6:51 pm
.) -- concluding that Federal Bureau of Prisons properly withheld records concerning its procurement of drugs used in federal executions, but that it could not withhold records pursuant to Exemption 7(E) because the exemption does not cover punishment phase of law enforcement. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
This is particularly so because under Article 1 of the Convention, the Convention does not apply at all where the defendant’s address is unknown. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:25 pm
Here are today's three burning legal questions, along with the answers provided by the blogosphere. 1. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:51 am
Does 1-15*Complaint in Capitol v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:04 am
See also Doe v Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 74 (1995); R. 2:11-3(e)(2). [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am
May 1, 2019). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
In this case, the Federal Circuit distinguished Chef America as it found the claim language at issue in Chef America was "unambiguous" whereas the term "sanitize" is ambiguous "in that it does not indicate when consumption is to take place. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:27 am
This sounds like a classic “sweetheart” deal and does not pass the smell test. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
With respect to whether the bill states a reasonable cause for removal, the bipartisan majority finds it does not. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:27 am
Oct. 10, 2017), plaintiff had been convicted of aggravated assault against the three defendants in a previous criminal case on July 31, 2014. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:32 am
After 10 hours, the employees is entitled to a second 30 minute break. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
The appellant points correctly to page 9, lines 10 to 13, in support.Hence, the Board does not share the view of the Examining Division that the cited passage on page 9 merely describes "the process of narrowing down a set of already present candidate views" and that the "origin of this initial set of candidate views ... remains undefined". [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm
The factors are: 1. [read post]
