Search for: "Does 1 - 75" Results 2621 - 2640 of 4,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
  This presents some of my reactions to the larger themes of the book.1. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
  This presents some of my reactions to the larger themes of the book.1. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:02 am
See Ex. 1 to Defs.' Opp'n to Pls.' Mot. at A05645. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 2:03 am by Florian Mueller
Sweeney has a point here about some selectivity by Apple, I don't think his declaration paints a complete picture either:He does not dispute another source than Google Trends that Apple cited: the Bloomberg article "Fortnite's Slowdown Has Epic Games Battling to Spark New Growth" (which relies on different data than Google Trends).Mr. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lexmark has crept into §43(a)(1)(A) via false endorsement; it will be interesting to see whether courts recognize that other trademark claims are likewise subject to a proximate cause requirement by that logic. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:28 pm by Patricia Hughes
” Therefore, the incidental effect on freedom of expression “does not warrant constitutional disapprobation of the oath” for several reasons, including that the appellants can “disavow” the oath’s message publicly (McAteer, CA, at paras. 75 and 76). [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
How does a divorced spouse qualify for benefits? [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:41 pm
Teleflex Inc., 127 S.Ct. 1727, 1739, 75 U.S.L.W. 4289 (2007). [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:48 am by William Innes
A purposive interpretation goes too far if it substitutes for the inquiry into the location of the property mandated by the statute an assessment of what does or does not constitute an “Indian” way of life on a reserve. . . . [22] And in paragraph 28 stated: [28] . . ., a purposive interpretation of the exemption does not require that the evolution of that way of life should be impeded. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 1:35 am by Kevin LaCroix
The auditor does not need to be registered with the PCAOB. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 1:35 am by Kevin LaCroix
The auditor does not need to be registered with the PCAOB. [read post]