Search for: "English v. English" Results 2621 - 2640 of 11,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
  The Supreme Court still held, however, in a misuse of private information claim, that unrestricted publication by the English media in hard copy as well as their own websites would be actionable because it would significantly add to the intrusiveness and distress felt by the claimant and his partner. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
  "The historical differences between Scottish and English Law, and what it means for Brexit" (BBC History Extra). [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:11 pm by John Floyd
  Deeply rooted in English common law, dating as far back as 1610, is the principle that judges cannot be paid from the fines they collect. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:24 pm by Peter Groves
What happens when the defendants are a Spanish company and a Spanish individual, and the trade mark owners are British (and the exclusive licensee is an English company)? [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Peter Groves
How the activist Court of Justice brought us to this position, developing the Information Society directive into a comprehensive harmonisation of copyright law, is another story on which a lot has already been said and much remains to say.Case C-683/17, Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G Star Raw CV EU:C:2019:721 (12 September) (in French – other language versions are available) [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 3:05 am by Apostolos Anthimos
It comes as the expected step forward, after the judgment rendered by the English CoA in the case Starlight Shipping Company v Allianz Marine & Aviation Versicherungs AG (The Alexandros T [2014] EWCA Civ 1010. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
Hacon HHJ noted that this judgment has significant persuasive effect on the English courts.However, UK academic opinion is divided on this topic. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am by Oswin Ridderbusch
See here for a review by Judge Jürgen Schell (in German) and a review by Miquel Montañá (in English). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm by Jason Kelley
EFF’s annual Pioneer Awards ceremony celebrates individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions to freedom and innovation on the electronic frontier. [read post]