Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 2621 - 2640 of 7,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
This list includes large states such as Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, and Texas. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:25 am by Russ Bensing
  The 9th District’s opinion in State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm by Daniel Clement
   The Court concluded that the schools in California were as good, if not better, than those in New York and, because the wife’s new husband was a veteran, the child would be entitled to attend a California state university free of charge. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
Phelps, the funeral-protest case, and United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:23 am by Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
Superior Court of California, San Francisco decision, where the Supreme Court clarified that California courts could not assert jurisdiction over the nonresident plaintiffs who had joined their claims against Bristol Myers Squibb with in-state plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:40 pm by Greg May
Even different criminal statutes in the same state can trigger preemption issues, as in People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:48 am by Paul Levy
(I have not analyzed whether ML-Implode would have had a good summary judgment motion) Rather than showing flaws in the ruling, this incident reminds us of the urgent need to adopt a federal anti-SLAPP statute, because all state anti-SLAPP laws are not alike. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm by Cicely Wilson
The State Bar Court’s hearing department, however, found that Glass had established the good moral character to be admitted as an attorney. [read post]