Search for: "Havens v. State"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2013, 12:49 pm
In King v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:05 am
The announcement also mentioned a companion complaint filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego (this post continues below the document): 17-07-06 Qualcomm v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:39 am
While this latest case, Sadler v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:31 am
In the United States, this month's Fifth Circuit decision in Continental v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:49 pm
And they're up to 4 law clerks/staff attorneys each.From the oral argument before the court Monday morning in Brumfield v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Here are a few more of her greatest hits for those not hip to her work:Still Convicting the InnocentProsecutorial Exceptionalism: Remedial Skepticism, and the Legacy of Connick v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am
McKenna: sometimes it’s just a state of uncertainty (difficulty in understanding) v. false actual belief. [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:11 am
The District Court’s decision amounts to a holding that a business selling goods on the internet can be sued in any state where it has a customer, which is to say, any state at all. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Destefano, No. 07-1428Title VII/White/Hispanic firefighters challenge New Haven CT's rejection of promotion exam results because of disparate impact on Blackso SCOTUS docket hereo Noted here: Connecticut Employment Law BlogGross v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am
I haven't researched the question, but I assume that such rationales would have passed muster under the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am
On the same day, Sir Peter Lane (sitting as a Judge in the High Court) heard the appeal and defendant’s application in the case of Secretary of State for Education v Marples KA-2024-000095. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
It's called Qaddura v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Prince rejects fair use when his stated intent was to have fun. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Increased volume of infringement, increased velocity, need for voluntary arrangements that haven’t yet materialized.Sen. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
As I’ve explained in earlier posts, the rules of evidence applicable in every state and in the federal judicial system bar the use of hearsay. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
And racers to the bottom haven’t had much success in court. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:27 pm
But in fact, MNN contends, Halleck and Melendez haven’t argued or shown that MNN is a state actor under any of the tests that the Supreme Court has established: MNN does not carry out an exclusive and traditional government function, and it is not coordinating with, compelled by or controlled by the city. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
