Search for: "In Interest of C." Results 2621 - 2640 of 42,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2011, 2:46 am by gmlevine
For example, the respondent is not making a bona fide offering of goods or services [paragraph 4(c)(i)] which can be inferred from the content of the website; is not “commonly known by the domain name” [paragraph 4(c)(ii)], evidenced from the Whois directory; and is not making a noncommercial or fair use of the domain name [paragraph 4(c)(iii)], again evidence by content. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:21 am by Michael Heise
As I am seeing more papers trying to do so (as well as discussions about strategies on how to do so), I thought links to a recent StataList discussion as well as some web-based resources might be of general interest. [read post]
18 May 2014, 12:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Two of the then minor children of J, A and C, are petitioners herein. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:05 pm
    I do not know how often C&D letters assert such a threat. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:37 pm
(a) Subject to the provisions of the governing documents and other applicable provisions of law, if the boundaries of the separate interest are contained within a building, the owner of the separate interest may do the following: (1) Make any improvements or alterations within the boundaries of his or her separate interest that do not impair the structural integrity or mechanical systems or lessen the support of any portions of the common interest development [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 10:54 pm by Steve Baird
Hebei IT Shanghai ltd c/o Domain Administrator, found reverse domain name hijacking, under some rather interesting, if not questionable circumstances. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am by David Fraser
C‑46, ss. 163.1(3), 163.1(4), 487.014(1) — Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, S.C. 2000, c. 5, s. 7(3)(c.1)(ii) — Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 8. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:56 am by D. Daxton White
., $600,000 and ordered more than $648,000 in restitution and interest to more than 3,600 customers for charging excessive markups and markdowns on corporate and agency bond transactions, and for related supervisory violations. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Nerushka Bowan
The functions of the Information Regulator include: to provide education about the Protection of Personal Information Act, for example, giving advice to data subjects in the exercise of their rights; to monitor and enforce compliance with POPI; to consult with interested parties; to handle complaints; to conduct research and to report to Parliament; to issue codes of conduct and make guidelines to assist bodies to develop codes of conduct; to facilitate cross-border cooperation in the… [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 1:55 am
Telepresence seems like an interesting new technology with potential value for BigLaw. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 12:45 pm
Buried in this article about Charter Cable hiring a corporate turnaround expert, is an interesting tidbit. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It was, however, ultimately for the court to balance the interests at stake. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 4:08 pm
C-SPAN has been running a wonderful series every Friday evening on hidden treasures in the Presidential Libraries. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  The most interesting among them was this preliminary statement of the issues Mr. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:53 am by Eva Rosenberg
Last week a taxpayer brought in a 1099-C with his other papers. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:41 am by Kluwer UPC News blogger
I hope the Constitutional Court will also take into account that the CJEU has already looked at all the Union law issues 4 times until now (Opinion 01/09, the joint decision on the Italian and Spanish appeals in 2013 (C-274/11 and C‑295/11) and the two Spanish appeals in 2015 (C-146/13 and C-147/13)); all arguments that are now on the table again have basically already been rejected. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:17 am by admin
In the recent decision of FBomb Clothing c/o Joel Jordan v. [read post]