Search for: "In Re: Golden" Results 2621 - 2640 of 3,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Henley, Don – Henley, DeVore file reply briefs in ‘parody’ battle (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Trademarks 50% successful with jus tertii defense: Golden Temple of Oregon, LLC v Wai Lana Productions, LLC and United Food Imports, Inc v Baroody Imports, Inc (Property, intangible) ‘Fraud and the TTAB: What hath Bose wrought? [read post]
22 May 2010, 9:33 am
Joseph’s now requires that 5% of its cath cases undergo a random and blinded re-review. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:00 pm by admin
Women tend to worry more than men about security in their Golden Years. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:50 am by David Doniger
  The Golden State can coordinate with the federal agencies again on harmonized national and state standards. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:36 am by Meg Martin
Golden: The Justices argued that the majority opinion misused the applicable rules of statutory construction so as to perpetuate irrational “complexities” and to create new “ambiguities” where none exist. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:18 pm by Jeff Lipshaw
  "We're all behind our baseball team; go get 'em, Tigers! [read post]
13 May 2010, 11:57 am by adio
“It’s early, but we’ve had a few bikers pass through already,” Fragola told the San Francisco Chronicle at about 5:30 a.m. while speaking at an energizer station on the north side of the Golden Gate Bridge. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:41 am
Fail to do so, and you've lost your golden ticket! [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:43 am by admin
  Women tend to worry more than men about security in their Golden Years. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:34 am by SOIssues
“But on the other hand, you’re stuck with what the law says. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:53 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
We're not sure why the Court spent considerable effort criticizing the policy, because it later held that even a perfect policy would not have saved the employer. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:38 pm by Lawrence Jackson
Milton Walsh would not re-offend and his predecessor handled the case adequately. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:48 pm
So we're feeling good about your use, as well.European law. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:04 am by law shucks
When you’re a lawyer with a golden ticket, you don’t blow it! [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:05 am by SHG
By the time I finished 1L year, I knew the golden rule for dealing with officers of the law: keep your mouth shut. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:37 am by Andrew Dat
  Since we’re only talking about criminal law here, let’s stick to that. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of USWEAR for boys clothing over US WEAR for adult’s clothing: In re USCANTEEN, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this specimen of use question: In re Seelect, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps North Face – ‘South Butt’ parody lawsuit comes to a quiet end (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney)   Wales Welsh dragon copied Hong Kong dragon? [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:49 pm by admin
The bright-eyed, bushy-tailed Marketing MBA’s at Sprint must not have learned a key marketing strategy while paying a fortune for their “education”- and it’s the golden rule of business survival. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:15 am by Steve McConnell
SCOTUS short-lists are sort of like Golden Globe ceremonies or TMZ episodes for law nerds like us. [read post]