Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 2621 - 2640 of 4,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2014, 3:58 pm by MBettman
  Justice O’Donnell wrote the other dissent in the merit decision, for himself and Justices Pfeifer and Kennedy. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Ernie Svenson
” And hey, more power to them if they’re happy with that. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 5:43 pm
Rob La Gatta: Going back to TechShow; are there any panelists you’re looking forward to seeing or folks you’re looking forward to meeting? [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
Waxman responded that Kennedy had addressed the impossibility standard of implied preemption. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
Every oral argument and judicial ruling, going back over a year now, prompts a new round of press releases and re-jiggering of briefs for the next case. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
Before the Senate could hold confirmation hearings, however, William Rehnquist died, and Roberts was re-designated as Bush 43’s nominee for chief justice. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
Gorsuch thus became a part-time member of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s chambers. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm by MBettman
In a 4-3 decision written by Justice Terrence O’Donnell, for himself and Justices Paul Pfeifer, Sharon Kennedy and Bill O’Neill, the court held that a child’s statement to his teachers about physical abuse constitutes testimonial evidence barred by the Confrontation Clause when the child has been found incompetent to testify. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm by MBettman
Justices Kennedy and French concurred in judgment in part, dissented in part, and concurred in paragraph one of the syllabus. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Kennedy, harbored for a more free, more just, and more equal nation. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
Justice Kennedy, as a follow-on to Justice Ginsburg on the 1952 patent act, pointed asked: "burden of going forward or burden of persuasion? [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
The question is whether the burdens are pursuant to a legitimate regulatory objective, or whether they're punitive. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Kennedy, 418 NE 2d 947 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1981 Furthermore, if the franchises that were started after the marriage were purchased using premarital funds from the older businesses, those newer businesses may be non-marital property as well. [read post]