Search for: "In Re United States"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 45,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 3:59 am
In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 3:59 am
In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:52 am
United States, 164 F.R.D. 422, 425 (N.D.W.Va.1996). [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
On May 17, 2019, Canada and the United States agreed to remove reciprocal trade restrictions on steel and aluminum – the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:59 pm
In the inane and insane case the United States does skip a debt payment, please let us skip the comparisons to Greece. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:40 pm
”'Section 602 in turn provides (and I'll again highlight the relevant provision):"Except as provided in subdivision (b), any person who is under the age of 18 years when he or she violates any law of this state or of the United States or any ordinance of any city or county of this state defining crime other than an ordinance establishing a curfew based solely on age, is within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 12:48 pm
Then….when they do realize that they should have been filing, it seems so overwhelming because it can be difficult to find someone to prepare old missing, unfiled tax returns here in the United States let alone when you're overseas. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:17 am
Bankruptcy filings all over the United States went up in 2010, and that just makes sense; we also saw around 1.1 mortgage foreclosures and trustee's sales in the same period, and bankruptcy and foreclosure go hand in hand. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:22 am
Two very strong, very sincere lines of thought were developing: United States Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president United States Attorneys are independent, apolitical prosecutors How does that work, Leon asked? [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:59 pm
"We will show up at their houses to make sure they're residing where they're supposed to. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:54 pm
We practice business law throughout the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 2:20 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 3:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:45 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a Notice on the “Duties of Disclosure and Reasonable Inquiry During Examination, Reexamination, and Reissue, and for Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board” on July 29, 2022 (87 FR 45764-67), without a big reaction from the IP community. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:45 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a Notice on the “Duties of Disclosure and Reasonable Inquiry During Examination, Reexamination, and Reissue, and for Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board” on July 29, 2022 (87 FR 45764-67), without a big reaction from the IP community. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 8:28 pm
That doctrinal response is not particular to the US, either, it is true in almost every culture or nation state. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:22 am
You also should not use it to enter the United States intending to have your employer re-sponsor you for a work-authorized change of status, as you cannot enter as a visitor with the intention of changing status after arrival. 16. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:48 am
Gronewoller (In Re Mascio), 454 B.R. 146 (D. [read post]
