Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 5,511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
The German courts have ruled that EPC 2000 claims correspond to purpose-limited product claims and can be directly infringed via an act in s.9(1) German Patents Act 1980. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 5:32 pm
MTCC 1168 suggests that there may not be much sympathy for the comfort of counsel in evading virtual options, interpreting the new Rule 1.08 of the Rules of Civil Procedure in the first reported decision since the amendment on Jan. 1, 2021, adding video conference. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 1:53 am
Uncertainty of the legal scope of class heading applications and registrations certainly matters. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
” The court has released 10 Second Amendment cases it has been holding for the New York case. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:10 am
Single titles, no matter how clever, are not entitled to trademark registration. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:10 am
Single titles, no matter how clever, are not entitled to trademark registration. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm
IPSO Rulings IPSO has published a single ruling from the Complaints Committee: 20887-17 A Man v Mail Online– Breach of Article 1 (Accuracy) and Article 2 (Privacy) Statements in Open Court and Apologies There were no statements in open court this week. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Co., — So.3d —-, 2010 WL 415262, 2009-0034 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/5/10), involved a lawsuit challenging the continuing refusal of Metropolitan Life Insurance to and its designates to approve the disability benefit claim of Louisiana Supreme Court employee Jack Harris. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Form ADV Annual Amendment. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
Bill 21 amends the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms to bring it in accordance with Bill 21 (s.33) and employs the section 33 override to prevent challenges under sections 2 and 7-15 of the Canadian Charter (s.34). [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
(“DWAC”) with violating Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder for making false and misleading statements and omissions in its registration statement on Form S-1, which was filed for the IPO, and Form S-4, which was filed for the de-SPAC transaction.[1] The Order found that the Form S-1… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 10:21 am
Fortunately, I see fewer overreactions by school administrators now compared to 10-15 years ago. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
B198118 In class action complaints against the County of Los Angeles alleging that the county imposed new utility user taxes without prior approval by the voters as required by law, and also raising a related equal protection claim, county's petition for a writ of mandate challenging certification of a class in the matter is denied as: 1) the rule from City of San Jose v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
The Onion could do something like: “Supreme Court Rules Supreme Court Rules. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:13 pm
Center 3700Decided: June 10, 2016The application on appeal was directed to a case for dispensing cleaning wipes. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 9:21 am
Theoretically, it's as simple as figuring out what the court would like to do if it had its druthers (no matter what Congress or the courts had previously opined), and assuming that they'll do that no matter what the law says. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
Question: You devote 10 pages to reproducing the final draft of Jackson’s unpublished opinion in Brown. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:20 am
The most significant aspects of Mexico's new Labor Reform include the following: 1.- General Principles of the Federal Labor Law. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:21 am
Under the SEC's rules, companies typically don't have an affirmative duty to disclose unless a Form 8-K is triggered or a periodic report (eg. 10-Q or 10-K) is due (I say "typically" because there are other 'disclose or abstain' circumstances to consider). [read post]
