Search for: "K. B. R." Results 2621 - 2640 of 5,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Prima facie allowability[1.4] It transpires from points 3 and 4 of the minutes of the OPs that the OD regarded the then final 3rd auxiliary request as prima facie overcoming the opposition grounds based on A 100(b) and A 100(c) (in combination with A 123(2)) and thus as prima facie allowable in these respects. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The EBA decided (see the order) that: 1(a): An opposition is not inadmissible purely because the person named as opponent according to R 55(a) EPC [1973] is acting on behalf of a third party. 1(b): Such an opposition is, however, inadmissible if the involvement of the opponent is to be regarded as circumventing the law by abuse of process. 1(c): Such a circumvention of the law arises, in particular, if: the opponent is acting on behalf of the patent proprietor … (emphasis… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:13 am by David Vasella
Dass DSG 12 II a - im Gegensatz zu lit. b und c - nicht ausdrücklich auf die Möglichkeit einer Rechtfertigung verweist, bedeutet laut BGer nicht, dass eine Rechtfertigung ausgeschlossen ist; sie könne aber nur "mit grosser Zurückhaltung" angenommen werden. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:04 pm by Kelly
I don’t think the IRS is actually expecting to match these up on a dollar for dollar basis, much as they don’t match forms 1099-B on a dollar for dollar basis. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:30 am
Levin 90,000 90,098 141,254 321,352 David B. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:25 am by Rechtsanwalt
So sei nicht er für die Zahlung der Transaktionsgebühren verantwortlich gewesen, sondern vielmehr die Kunden, welche von ihm gemanagt wurden. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
That same day, the Staff also issued these two new Regulation Crowdfunding CDIs: – New Question 201.02 – New Question 202.01 The new CDIs address thresholds for disclosure of related party transactions under Rule 201(r) & eligibility to terminate ongoing reporting obligations under Rule 202(b)(2). [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]APPENDIX A IN THE CIRCUIT COURTOF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIALCIRCUIT IN AND FOR BREVARDCOUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-1991-7249-AXXXSTATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, o MARK DEAN SCHWAB, r Defendant. --------------~/ ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE OR STAY EXECUTION This matter came before the Court upon the Defendant's Motion to VacateSentence or Stay Execution. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 5:38 am
(b) The team warden will designate one of the selected executioners as the primary executioner and the other as the secondary executioner. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
Preparing Your 2020 Form 20-F Posted by Michael Willisch, Reuven B. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 8:46 am
New York has a "special employment" a/k/a "borrowed servant" doctrine, which basically says that if you are employed by Company A, which lends you to Company B, and you are injured because of Company B's negligence, you can't sue Company B as long as Company A provided you with workers' compensation. [read post]