Search for: "L. Good" Results 2621 - 2640 of 18,622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2010, 5:08 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Permanent Bureau | Bureau Permanent 6, Scheveningseweg    2517 KT The Hague | La Haye   The Netherlands | Pays-Bas telephone | téléphone  +31 (70) 363 3303   fax | télécopieur  +31 (70) 360 4867 e-mail | courriel  secretariat@hcch.net    website | site internet  http://www.hcch.net *  *  * Vacancy at the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference (beginning between 15 May and 1 July 2011) Lawyer… [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 11:50 pm by Steve Baird
For example, you might wonder, what might happen when someone files a multi-class, intent-to-use federal trademark and service mark application, claiming a bona-fide intent-to-use the applied-for mark in connection with an exceedingly broad description of goods and services covering nine different classes, including over-breadth examples like “education and entertainment services” in Int’l Class 41? [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 2:24 pm by VMaryAbraham
This means that once economic good times return, organizations should expect a mass exodus of Boomers and younger high-performers. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 5:58 am
A good aphorism from Roy Edroso, in his Village Voice column which reviews what "rightbloggers" are saying, this time focusing on that NYT article "Has the 'Libertarian Moment' Finally Arrived? [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:40 am
CGL – LATE NOTICE – NO PREJUDICE RULE – GOOD FAITH BELIEF IN NONLIABILITY Ponok Realty Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
In this appeal from a Section 2(d) refusal, the Board found applicant's goods (air fresheners and deodorizers) to be partly identical to goods of the cited registration (air fresheners and deodorizers). [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 4:37 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal over the same ZOG & Design registration as involved here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:59 am by John L. Welch
There was no evidence of third-party use of the word "POD" in connection with similar electronic devices, and Apple has consistently acted to protect its IPOD mark.And so the Board found confusion likely and it sustained Apple's Section 2(d) claim.TTABlog comment: Someone should write an article about the differing cut-off dates for evidence on various issues: fame under Section 2(d), fame for dilution, relatedness of the goods, etc.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:55 am by Jon Brodkin
The "Shop In Kindle Store" link may be coming back to Amazon's iOS app. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Jeff Blackwell
Although your time is limited, remember that good lawyers are usually busy lawyers. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm by J. Benjamin Stevens
A good rule of thumb: if it is not a decision you would let your children make while you were married, then don’t let them make it now. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
November 2018 is most certainly a good month for the auction house Christie’s. [read post]