Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 28,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm
The decision is The State of California v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:55 am
(IBM v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:24 am
This cannot be laid at the door of the Secretary of State. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
In apparent anticipation of the Supreme Court upholding the High Court’s decision, it has been reported that the Government has drawn up a three-line bill to be put to Parliament for approval on the triggering of Article 50. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:08 pm
When I am up to date on my summaries of court decisions from Delaware's Chancery Court and Supreme Court, I often refer to interesting cases in other Delaware courts or the courts of neighboring jurisdictions, such as the Delaware County (PA) Court of Common Pleas, which is the trial court of general jurisdiction just across the state line from Wilmington.Here is a case that I thought was notable simply for a passing observation about personal jurisdiction over… [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
In Van de Kamp v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 6:46 am
” Consumers Energy Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:32 pm
v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am
A similar line was taken by Ward LJ in Widlake in which he emphasised that punishment in costs was the appropriate remedy in the case of a fraudulently exaggerated claim. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
In line with its jurisprudence in other whistleblower cases such as Kudeshkina v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 2:54 am
Overlawyered leads us to this line from a Posner opinion in Mirafasihi v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:21 am
The Supreme Court took the relatively unusual step yesterday of summarily reversing in a case from a state court, Marmet Health Care, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:20 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:30 am
United States, and Yates v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Sveen v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in its 2019 Rucho v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
But it is totally fair to note that where this line is drawn is questionable. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
Today the COA has issued its ruling, notable in part for the 3 pages of names lined up on the side of Smith & Wesson: In Smith and Wesson Corporation, et al v. [read post]
