Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2009, 8:14 am
There is no difference between this Ten Commandments display and the one at the Texas state capitol that was upheld by the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Also, there was a House of Lords decision in 1891, Mobil v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am
The judge began with a broad definition: Stated generally the law is clear that patents are directed to those likely to have a real and practical interest in the subject matter of the invention[2]. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:11 am
My read of the transcript of the February 6 State Farm v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
Blackmon v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
” [see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37, [2006] 1 AC 173, per Lord Hoffman at p.186H]. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
The Secretary of State for Justice v RB & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1608 (20 December…. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
In Re Beech, Saint v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 3:12 am
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including but not limited to title V and section 604 of the 1974 Act, do proclaim that: (1) The designation of Bangladesh as a beneficiary developing country under the GSP is suspended on the date that is 60 days after the date this proclamation is published in the Federal Register [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes reserved judgment in the case of Woodrow v Johansson On 20 January 2012, the Administrative Court handed down judgment in the R (Associated Newspapers) v Lord Justice Leveson ([2012] EWHC 57 (Admin)). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:21 am
To further justify deference, the court cited A v Secretary of State for the Home Department, also known as the Belmarsh 9 case, in which the English House of Lords held that deference would be given to the executive’s decision on the assessment of public emergency and the counter-measure devised after the 9/11 terrorist attack in the US. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
Instead he found a real live action brought by the Spanish against our lords and masters in the Council of the European Union itself: Case C-274/11 Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union, to be precise. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
