Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 15,539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2021, 4:56 am
According to the General Court, consumers do not tend to break a sign down into word elements when that word element suggests a concrete meaning or resembles words known to them.In addition, previous case law already confirmed that there could be a likelihood of confusion despite the identical part of the signs at issue lacking meaning and that the start of the signs were different (T‑229/10, Graf-Syteco v OHIM, and T‑96/14, Vimeo LLC v OHIM).The General Court therefore… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decisions in Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm
But the alternative interpretation--and that's actually the one I prefer--is that "high" in this context refers to the office of the one who committed the alleged wrongdoing, not in the sense of making anything reproachable a potential basis for impeachment, but connecting it to how someone carried out their duties as opposed to, say, a minor offense in their private life.The line-drawing problem here is that too low a standard would give Congress too much latitude. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
The legislative history of the TMA, just enacted into law, includes several paragraphs blessing Rogers v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
”As long as the American Republic survives, Trump’s four-year reign is likely to remain notorious enough that this will be a low-value, $100 question. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm
It was devised by the Supreme Court in the 1946 case SEC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
An offence involving low culpability and low harm will fall into band 1A. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
A little history: in 1989, in the seminal Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
Low quality family law services in a custody dispute would harm not only the interests of the parent client, but of the children. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 10:53 am
Although EPA initially chose to exclude these uses from its analysis, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered EPA to include them following a successful legal challenge lodged by consumer groups in Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:51 pm
The justices divided on ideological lines in the ruling in Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:46 pm
The question before the court on Tuesday in Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:18 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm
Economic Forecast, that there not only is a lack of concern about U.S. debt from investors’ perspective but the all time low interest rates on such debt demonstrates that “the world wants more, not less, American debt”. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
I have been writing about the fundamental shift in the focus of human rights and human rights discourse, from one framed in the discursive tropes of liberal democratic ideology to one framed in an emerging Marxist-Leninist discourse (Backer, Larry Catá, ‘By Dred Things I am Compelled’: China and the Challenge to International Human Rights Law and Policy (January 15, 2020). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:19 pm
See Amarin Pharma v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:59 am
The analysis of these rulings – discussed in Chapter V of this Report – shows that plaintiffs filed a high predominance of cases against employers in “plaintiff-friendly” jurisdictions such as the judicial districts within the Second and Ninth Circuits. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 8:28 pm
The Court in Council of Canadians with Disabilities v VIA Rail Canada Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 5:27 pm
Congrats to Michael Caruso, Andy Adler , and D'Arsey Houlihan for the cert grant in Terry v. [read post]
