Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
[B.] [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
See 9 FAM 601.7-3(c)(2)(a)(“Correspondence with Representatives of Record, Attorneys”). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:45 pm
Substantive Provisions. 34 B. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
Keith Davidson—Davidson, Clifford’s lawyer, is “Lawyer B” in the statement of facts. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 3:46 pm
Trump and/or the Office of Donald J. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
Meanwhile, further down the judicial corridor, Holman J took a different view. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Arkansas where (a) the prosecution advises a trial court that the appointment of a particular lawyer in a capital case to represent multiple defendants may create a conflict of interest; (b) the appointed lawyer informs the court that he is financially unable to appoint capitally certified counsel for each of the co-defendants; (c) the court acknowledges these conflicts of interest, but delegates resolution of them to the same lawyer; (d) the conflicted attorney then advocates in a… [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am
The support claims and other financial matters were tried before a referee in December 2008. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
§ 11501(b)(4). [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Navarro, April 2, 2018, Thomas, C.). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:25 pm
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
There is no single book that covers the subject matter in full detail. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
But proving this specific factual assertion (and proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that defendants knew this assertion was likely false) would be very hard. c. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The joint judgment in two separate claims against Google, is the first time the English courts have had to rule on the application of the ‘right to be forgotten’ principle following the decision in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Carolyn B. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
[229] PruneYard, 447 U.S. at 87. [230] 475 U.S. 1, 28 (1986). [231] See, e.g., Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act, S. 4534, 116th Cong., sec. 2(1)(b)(II) (2020) (exempting fro [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
Notice of opposition was filed against the granted patent, the opponent requesting revocation of the patent in its entirety on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step (Articles 54(2) and 56 EPC and Article 100(a) EPC), lack of sufficiency of disclosure (Article 100(b) EPC) and added subject-matter (Article 100(c) EPC).III. [read post]
