Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 7:01 am
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:01 am
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm
^C ? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:26 pm
Attorneys Reed Brodsky and Richard C. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:26 pm
Attorneys Reed Brodsky and Richard C. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The Board concluded that the Association’s mandatory on-call and General Municipal Law §207-c proposals were nonarbitrable under §209.4(g) of the Act because they were unitary demands that included inseparable nonarbitrable components under §209.4(g) of the Act. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
(c) Allowing a request for amendment at a late stage of the examination proceedings during which the applicant has already had at least one opportunity to amend the application, and after the ED has already completed substantive examination thereof, will be an exception and not the rule (G 7/93 [2.3]). [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
G 2/10, as I understand it, states that under more general conditions, the only thing that matters is that what is claimed in the end complies with A 123(2). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
Not only must the proceeding commence in one of the above named jurisdictions, but the proceeding must be based on: (a) an application to pass accounts, if it is contested; (b) formal proof of testamentary instrument, objection to issuing certificate of appointment, return of certificate, or claims against an estate; (c) Part V of the Succession Law Reform Act; (d) the Substitute Decisions Act; (e) the Absentee Act, the Charities Accounting Act, the Estates Act, the Trustee Act, or… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:57 am
To take an extreme example, the content of a budget speech is a matter of great public interest. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 7:48 am
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:12 am
Yet every now and then it seems to tie itself up on a procedural matter, such as this case. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Approval was not given. [3.4] According to the jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal (see G 10/91 [headnote3] and G 7/95), fresh grounds for opposition may be considered in appeal proceedings only with the approval of the patentee. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
The EBA answered the referred questions in its decision G 1/08. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The Board held that the joint employer’s second amended charge, which alleged for the first time that the Association’s General Municipal Law (GML) §207-c hearing proposal was nonarbitrable under §209.4(g) of the Act, was untimely because it did not relate back to the joint employer’s original claim challenging the mandatory nature of the proposal under the Act. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm
Proponent for proposed Classes 7B and C. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
In support of proposed Classes 7B, C, and G. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
If a matter was not commenced on the Estates List, yet falls into one of the categories mentioned above, the matter can be transferred to the Estates List on consent, or on a motion, to either a judge who is hearing the matter (but not sitting on the Estates List), or a judge sitting to hear matters on the Estates List. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:23 pm
Howard G. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:01 pm
It was a matter of dispute between the parties whether this amendment infringed A 100(c). [3.2] The term “consists essentially of” in claim 1 of the main request implies that apart from the stanol/sterol esters, only certain types and amounts of other components may be present in the texturizing agent, namely those types and amounts that do not materially affect the essential characteristics of the texturizing agent (see the interpretation of the term “consisting… [read post]
