Search for: "Matter of Jones v Jones"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
Preemption is a matter of federal law overriding state law, so it’s logical to think that state judges may have a different perspective than federal ones. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Jones that filing a civil suit would not. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 5:23 am
” Zito v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
If by chance the vote splits 50 to 50 between the two candidates, Senate President Joe Biden (who will still be Vice President until January 20, 2013, no matter what happens in the fall election) could then vote (presumably for himself) to break the tie. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v) It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 11:47 am
Rul. 75-384 (organization didn’t qualify as exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3) where its primary activity was to sponsor antiwar protest demonstration in which demonstrators urged to violate local ordinances and commit acts of civil disobedience); Bob Jones University vs. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 8:21 pm
” Watson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:04 am
No troll cartoons, unfortunately, but it was fun to watch Hilda talk about the SanDisk v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
Eugene V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
See Katzenbach v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
As I’ve mentioned here previously, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kevin Kelly and his girlfriend Regina Jones went to a Halloween party at the Rustic Café in Old Lyme, Connecticut into 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Now, as outcry over the indiscriminate use of LLWs against Black Lives Matter protesters mounts, some municipalities are weighing restrictions on the weapons. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
For a copy of the Commission’s Liability Opinion, please refer to In the Matter of Rambus, Inc., FTC Docket No. 9302, available at [www.ftc.gov] (filed on August 2, 2006). [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 2:51 am
First, the Court held that, as a threshold matter, the expressive-association right applied. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
- Washington v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
