Search for: "People v David S." Results 2621 - 2640 of 5,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, David Alan Slansky recoils at the idea that policymakers debating possible responses to the threat of terrorism have described the court’s notorious decision in Korematsu v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And for Geof, modern episodes of hate speech are often similar to the controversy over the Viet Nam War—people have understandably strong opinions about such episodes, but the university’s role is to ensure that individuals get to air those opinions, not to shape or influence them by university imprimaturs or condemnations. [read post]
24 Sep 2006, 11:21 am
At this point, many people are probably zoning out while trying to read all the recent "zeroing" decisions. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But most all rules I have ever seen—especially in public address settings—do not go that far; they simply prevent “disruption” the way Stanford’s (and seemingly Maryland’s) own rules apparently do.So what can/ought we do with people who engage in shouting down? [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
Justice Kagan has been named to TIME’s 2013 list of its one hundred most influential people in the world. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
Here is one of my favorites, which comments on the case of People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 12:42 pm by Emmah Wabuke
As noted by Kenya’s high court in Republic v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Elena Kagan shared an episode of Lawfare No Bull which featured audio from the Jan. 6 committee’s eighth public hearing: Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Wittes, Orpett, Jurecic, Molly Reynolds, and David Priess discussed the Jan. 6 committee’s eighth public hearing. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  What kinds of things people react to as stealing v. legit borrowing matters.A: Moral facts: a prior Q. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 8:01 am
We also had a great wrap up by Attorney David Frederick, the brilliant trial lawyer who argued and won the Weyth v Levine case before the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Michael Bahar, David Cook, Varun Shingari and Curtis Arnold outlined how the Supreme Court’s ruling in Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: David Savage reports for the Los Angeles Times that in this morning’s conference, the justices will consider whether to hear City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
  Netanyahu’s lawyer, David Shimron, said after the suit was filed that “never since the 1950s, has there been such a grievous case of libel. [read post]