Search for: "People v. Eugene"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 11:55 pm
He had no problem with eugenics. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds today’s State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
(Eugene Volokh) I’m delighted to report that the new UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed its first brief, on behalf of the Cato Institute, in Edwards v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:06 am
People interested in the subject may also want to read a response to Neomi’s paper, United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:51 pm
This year the competition focuses on National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:16 pm
See Wayte v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:12 am
(Eugene Volokh) From today’s unanimous decision in People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:55 pm
In any event, the proposal is clearly unconstitutional (see, e.g., Florida Star v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:40 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:38 am
(Eugene Volokh) Kubert v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm
Bray v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:02 pm
That was Eugene Volokh's argument, and I think it was a very colorable one, rejected rather too easily by the Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:47 am
Harding's pardon of Eugene V. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 3:50 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Kiennitz v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 2:19 am
Lombardo is the author of the very important book on Buck v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:17 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So states State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:34 pm
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:12 pm
It’s true that this quote is indeed what Justice Stewart is famous for, but people generally miss the follow-up to the quote: Nine years later Stewart joined the dissent in Miller v. [read post]
