Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 2,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
In today’s case (Snow v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
See, e.g., Gavaldon v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:24 am
In Arista Records LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 7:30 pm
Holder. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
No, says the Supreme Court of India in Sri Kumar Padma Prasad v Union of India : (1992) 2 SCC 428, an important case concerning the validity of appointment of a certain Mr Srivastava to the Gauhati High Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
In Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council, the principle of legality was held to mean that a body exercising public power is required to act within the powers lawfully given to it, and in President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union, the principle necessitated that the holder of the public power must act in good faith and not misconstrue his powers. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
S'holders Litig., 2009 Del. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:13 pm
The Walt Disney Company could not plausibly claim that patent or trade secret law gives it the power to limit free use of Steamboat Willie, either. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
Ruling in M.H. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Spicy IP) PanIIT Alumni India leads the way in incubating ideas (Spicy IP) Rigging data: IPRs and the impact of counterfeits (Spicy IP) The Competition Commission: separation of power troubles again? [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:59 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 5:23 am
This is because the aim of the section is to protect the trade mark's selling power rather than its dignity. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:25 pm
No. 1 v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:11 am
SourceOne Global Partners, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:41 am
Craft and FDIC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
Since CAIP v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:23 pm
Holder. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:48 pm
No. 1 v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Ricci, et al. v. [read post]
