Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 2621 - 2640 of 55,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2023, 10:27 pm by Martin Osborne
If you have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please contact the authors. [1] CCIG Investments Pty Ltd v Schokman [2023] HCA 21 at [4]-[6]. [2] Ibid at [12], citing Bugge v Brown (1919) 26 CLR 110 at 118; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511 at 589 [223]; Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161 at 173 [33]; Prince Alfred College Inc v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134 at 148 [40]. [3] Ibid at [14]. [4] Schokman… [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:19 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm by Ronald Mann
“Congress purports to exercise that power under the Constitution, an extraordinary power. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:00 am by ernst
As part of our continuing series of posts covering the awards and honors announced at the recently concluded annual meeting of the American Society for Legal History, here are the Society’s Student Research Colloquium Fellows for 2023:Omar Abdel-Ghaffar, Harvard University, James Whitman/Yale Law School Fellow:The Uncharitable Foundations of Mamluk Endowment Siobhan Barco, Princeton University Women, Power, and the Legal News, 1830-1930 Bonnie Cherry, University of… [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am by Elizabeth Goitein
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
First, the rule in Bonnard v Perryman makes interim injunctions very difficult where (as would almost always be the case in a putative SLAPP), the primary cause of action is defamation. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]