Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 2621 - 2640 of 4,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
Similarly, the 2nd congressional district, which currently covers the North Shores of Nassau, western Suffolk, and eastern Queens, was redrawn to include parts of the Bronx and Westchester.And those changes took everyone by surprise. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:41 am by India McKinney
Hit the button below to tell your elected officials to vote against this bill: Take action TELL congress: Defeat this bad 702 Bill Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
" The same, apparently, applied to queens. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:28 pm by Colin Murray
In other words, he is an accomplice who turns Queen’s evidence on a grand scale. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  The judge said that “If one of the late King’s physicians had kept a diary of what he had heard and seen, this Court would not in the King’s lifetime, have permitted him to print or publish it.“ In 1849 the Queen’s consort brought proceedings to restrain the publication of surreptitiously obtained private etchings made by himself and the Queen (Prince Albert v Strange (1848-9) 2 De G & Sm 652). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:48 am
And the Appellate Division for the Second Department (hearing appeals from Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens and Westchester) is usually thought to be stingy but look what it did in the Dooknah v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
In the first two cases, irrational and scandalous or delusional claims of illegitimate descendancy were made against the estates of the late Queen Mother and/or Princess Margaret: see Brown v Executors of the Estate of HM Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother [2008] EWCA Civ 56; [2008] 1 WLR 2327 and In re Benmusa (No 3) [2017] EWHC 966 (Fam). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 8 June 2016 the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Cassell & Anor v The Queen (Montserrat) concerning whether the Court of Appeal had been wrong to dismiss the appeal and not give direction for a re-trial. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen: “Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:51 pm
Quick off the mark with Brazil's choice of logo for the 2014 soccer World Cup was IP Tango's Latin blog queen Patricia Covarrubia. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am by Amy Howe
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times) previews the oral arguments in Reed v. [read post]