Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 2621 - 2640 of 7,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The first ten in the first stage are different elements in the relevant state of the art and the eleventh is the conclusion the judge drew from them. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:52 am by NCC Staff
The Anti-abortion Movement Will Win Even If It Loses By Mary Ziegler, professor at the Florida State University College of Law Legal scholar Mary Ziegler argues that a Supreme Court ruling against Texas’s recent abortion law, Senate Bill 8, would not indicate that the Court will continue to preserve its decision in Roe v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
“The State cannot use criminal defamation cases to throttle democracy,” he observed. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Wiggin LLP published a Media Law Round Up, reviewing the case law and legislative developments in 2023. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court‘s recent decision in Pritchard v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
  He cites the Brown v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by Marissa Miller
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:13 am
At the Am Law Daily, Joe Mullin recaps yesterday’s oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
The same provision of DOMA, of course, was later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 6:26 am
This essay continues their look into the Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]