Search for: "STONE v. STONE" Results 2621 - 2640 of 3,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:29 pm
Another masterly round-up of those transatlantic tribulations from our very own specialist. * "Breaking News: 4th Circuit paves a partial path for Rosetta Stone in Google Adwords case", here. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
Morel (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google – Google asks California judge to declare that it is not liable for copyright infringement, simply by linking to copyright-infringing works on RapidShare (1709 Copyright Blog) Universal Music Group – Amici urge 9th Circuit to reverse UMG v Veoh case; RIAA, NBCU, PROs and WLF weigh in (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court E D Virginia dismisses Rosetta… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
 In the Huffington Post, Geoffrey Stone analyzes the decision and suggests that it runs contrary to the Court’s holding in Scales v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
Litecoin Foundation Limited v (1) Inshallah Limited (2) Nasjet Limited (3) John Pepin [2021] EWHC 1998 (Ch) (July 2021) Litecoin is a cryptocurrency, promoted and developed by the claimant. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
At the same time, along this journey we also encounter many stumbling stones, which make it more difficult and demanding to hasten towards the Risen Lord. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Art V of the US Constitution, for example, imposed a complete ban on amendments of Art I s 9 cl 1 and 4 until 1808. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rolling Stone (weird reasoning for why Camel wasn’t liable for editorial in insert surrounded by Camel ads); Jewel v. [read post]