Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 2621 - 2640 of 4,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2012, 11:05 am by Michael M. O'Hear
United States (No. 11-5683), the Supreme Court resolved an important circuit split on the interpretation of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:08 pm by Michael O'Hear
United States (No. 11-5683), the Supreme Court resolved an important circuit split on the interpretation of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 6:07 am by Marissa Miller
  In an interview with Fox News, the Justice discussed gun control and the Court’s recent Second Amendment cases, responded to criticism of his dissent in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:27 pm by immigrationprof
In an interview to be aired on C-SPAN next Sunday, Justice Scalia defended his dissent in part in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:21 am by Rachel Sachs
United States, and Filarsky v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
 Lynn said that the webinar would cover the:  Overview and analysis of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Decision. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
(The Root) -- This is most likely not at the top of your list as you begin to determine your man for president of the United States come Nov. 6. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
HamiltonSecession and Breach of Compact:  The Law of Nature Meets the United States ConstitutionStephen C. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am by Rachel Sachs
The Court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
Heller, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects “the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Cormac Early
Yesterday’s coverage of the Court focused on Justice Scalia’s interview with Piers Morgan, in which he discussed his relationship with the Chief Justice and defended the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
While we’re on the subject of “a federal statute is presumed to supplement rather than displace state law,” perhaps Garner and Scalia would like to take a moment to explain PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am by SHG
Scalia, naturally, dissented, because somebody has to take one for the team.Unfortunately, the jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court ends right about the Texas border, where the 5th Circuit has decided that Martinez may be fine for the United States, but has no place in the Republic of Texas. [read post]