Search for: "See v. See" Results 2621 - 2640 of 122,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2010, 12:44 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Lee was involved in a car accident, the Department of Transportation determined that Lee was subject to the security requirements of Wisconsin's safety responsibility law, see Wis. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 10:42 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Williams appeals the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of armed robbery, see Wis. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:26 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
See Taylor, 596 F.3d at 376 (several unrelated questions [...] [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm by Eric Goldman
Some highlights and comments on the plaintiffs’ reply brief (see my post yesterday about the state’s attempted defense of the law). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A [*2]party who is “likely to succeed” on an appeal in the underlying action is required to pursue an appeal before proceeding with a legal malpractice cause of action (Grace v Law, 24 NY3d 203, 210; see Buczek v Dell & Little, LLP, 127 AD3d 1121, 1123). [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
Culliver (09-158), and invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Holy See v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:22 pm
FURTHER UPDATE: Attorneys in the Boomediene v. [read post]