Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 122,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
’ See In [...] [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 1:56 pm
For the decision and oral argument, see The Oyez Project. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:36 am
’ See U.S.S.G. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:26 am
See Taylor, 596 F.3d at 376 (several unrelated questions [...] [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 11:10 am
See previous AT! [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:46 pm
See Cohen [...] [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:18 am
" (See also Tan Jay Internat., Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:17 am
(See United States V. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:02 pm
-EV] [V.] [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:22 am
V. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
Some highlights and comments on the plaintiffs’ reply brief (see my post yesterday about the state’s attempted defense of the law). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:32 am
A [*2]party who is “likely to succeed” on an appeal in the underlying action is required to pursue an appeal before proceeding with a legal malpractice cause of action (Grace v Law, 24 NY3d 203, 210; see Buczek v Dell & Little, LLP, 127 AD3d 1121, 1123). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
959; see B.H. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
Culliver (09-158), and invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Holy See v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
See LeMans Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 8:30 am
See Schilling v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:50 am
By my count, there are three four (see update below) clearly employment law cases left: New Process Steel v. [read post]
