Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 2621 - 2640
of 41,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
Hall v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
§ 1365(b)(1)(B) bars a citizen suit as stated: "(B) if [a state or federal authority] has commenced and is diligently prosecuting a civil or criminal action in a court of the United States, or a State to require compliance with the standard, limitation, or order . . . ." [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:49 am
By Jason Rantanen General Protecht Group v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:36 am
The TİB stated that this was the only technical means of blocking the offending site, as its owner lived abroad. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:36 pm
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
SEARCH & SEIZUREUnited States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
With respect to design patent damages in Apple v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm
Significantly, the Court was careful to note that pleading the requisite degree of “injury” for purposes of Prop 64 standing is not onerous:We also relied on the United States Supreme Court's description of "injury in fact" for federal court standing purposes as " 'an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized . . . and (b) "actual or imminent, not 'conjectural' or 'hypothetical,'… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
UNITED STATES In Padilla v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
Since it's rather unclear what Congress wanted to do in 1970 when it adopted Section 36(b), policy can inform the applicable legal standard. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:52 am
§ 1400(b) refers only to a defendant’s State of Incorporation for patent infringement venue purposes. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:47 am
v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
Dare v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:54 pm
In People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The Ninth Circuit had addressed the meaning of §1453(b) in Abrego Abrego v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:54 am
Kosten v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
