Search for: "State v. Bai"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 5:37 pm
Circuit Court to reopen the case of Kiyemba v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:12 am
A recent decision by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division (STATE v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:38 am
The “substantial evidence” standard applies in administrative hearings; the "arbitrary and capricious" test governs in contract disciplinary actions Matter of Edwards v Oyster Bay-East Norwich Cent. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
The property owners have filed an application for a writ of certiorari asking the Hawaii Supreme Court to review the decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals in Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:01 am
Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:42 am
United States (upholding a military curfew on Japanese-Americans living in certain “military areas” in California) and Korematsu v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Yozmot 33 Limited (EPLAW) United States US General Comcast owes P2P users $16; yes, they should take it (Ars Technica) Dow Jones files hot news misappropriation suit against Breifing.com (The Trademark Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms ITC’s findings that Global Locate has standing, SiRF directly infringes patents: SiRF v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Challenge to plaintiff’s… [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm
United States (upholding a military curfew on Japanese-Americans living in certain “military areas” in California) and Korematsu v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm
United States (upholding a military curfew on Japanese-Americans living in certain “military areas” in California) and Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
"Stevens wrote most of the court's decisions that struck the previous administration's policies on the rights of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
Pinsky, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe, New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance President and CEO Roland Lewis, and an array of New York City waterfront advocates. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:57 am
Edison Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Bush (2004) -- held that federal courts have jurisdiction to consider legal appeals filed on behalf of foreign citizens held by the U.S. military at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba.Kelo v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:19 pm
In Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
In Rasul v Bush and Hamdan v Rumsfeld, Stevens asserted the role of the courts even in wartime determinations of the fate of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
