Search for: "State v. Character" Results 2621 - 2640 of 7,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
Moreover, because the right to practice law is a state-granted privilege that puts an individual's character and fitness at issue, this type of dishonesty in law school-and in connection with obtaining an important position in the federal courts-cannot be said to have `no public ramifications. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
Applying the multi-part inquiry test for admiralty tort jurisdiction stated by the Supreme Court in Sisson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Results such as the recent Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Fun with fundamentals, US-styleRight: the seal of the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeThe IPKat, still behind with his Christmas reading, has at last had the chance to examine Fundamentals of United States Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patent, Trademark, the second edition of which was published by Kluwer Law International towards the close of 2006. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:30 am
That changed on March 2, 2010 when the United States Supreme Court decided Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:29 am
Ct. 764 (2007)-->For there to be a case or controversy under Article III, the dispute must be "definite and concrete, touching the legal relations of parties having adverse legal interests," "real and substantial," and "admi[t] of specific relief through a decree of a conclusive character, as distinguished from an opinion advising what the law would beupon a hypothetical state of facts. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:00 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Interestingly, the court held that the sign must have distinctive character throughout the European Union, and that a lack of distinctiveness in a single member state may be enough to refuse registration. [read post]