Search for: "State v. David." Results 2621 - 2640 of 14,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by David Post
[For a summary of the many studies in this area, see the Scholars' Amicus Brief in Vasquez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by David Post
[For a summary of the many studies in this area, see the Scholars' Amicus Brief in Vasquez v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:59 am by Jessica Jones
The post Case Comment – Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:05 am by INFORRM
  The Supreme Court rejected the first, put forward in Spiller v Joseph ([2010] UKSC 53), which argued for a reform of the law of honest comment in libel so that the defendant’s state of mind would be wholly irrelevant and the test would only depend upon the objective criterion. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:58 am
United States, No. 07-359. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm by Dan Flynn
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:04 pm
David Benowitz is a criminal defense lawyer in Washington DC and founding partner of Price Benowtiz LLP. [read post]