Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 2621 - 2640 of 5,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm by Lisa McElroy
Heller – the landmark case holding that the federal government cannot limit the right of individuals to keep and bear arms – should also apply to states and municipalities. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:01 pm
But I strongly believe that, if a patent claim is without merit, then it’s your moral obligation to step up and defend yourself, not just for the good of your company, but for the good of the patent system as a whole. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
The Supreme Court's ruling this past summer in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s taken time for some of his predictions to bear fruit, but they did. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Their power is enhanced precisely because the objects are mass produced within the Regulation Platform through their variation mimics the controlled variation of mass produced consumer goods (where color and marginal characteristics may vary, and the appearance of choice is given the consumer, though the core of the object exists beyond choice). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Walker, 11-1011, another Sixth Circuit state-on-top habeas case, which presents a question left open two Terms ago in Wood v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:05 pm
Similarly, the right to have a verdict in a medical malpractice case that accounts for inflation is recognized by the court in Nguyen v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am by Dave
  This is laid bare in the forensic judgment of Cranston J and bears reading by any local authority officer and member concerned with their proper roles. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am by Dave
  This is laid bare in the forensic judgment of Cranston J and bears reading by any local authority officer and member concerned with their proper roles. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:38 am
Thanks to Greg Lastowka for pointing me to this case: Bach v. [read post]