Search for: "State v. Howes" Results 2621 - 2640 of 72,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2023, 4:43 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Wisdom Onwuchekwa-Banogu (Columbia Law School) has posted Zero-Option Defendants: United States v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:09 am
I have posted my views about how this current state... [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:09 am by Adam Steinman
United States, the Supreme Court will revisit a thorny question: how to determine the precedential... [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:40 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:59 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Cain, the case testing how state courts must consider evidence of mental retardation in death penalty sentencing proceedings. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:11 pm
McQuillan, and Hovannes Abramyan, "Tort Law Tally: How State Tort reforms affect Tort Losses and Tort Insurance Premiums". [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
Newman (Wake Forest) has posted several tax papers on SSRN: Baseball Autographs, 116 Tax Notes 1078 (2007) CHAMP: How the Tax Court Finessed a Bad Statute, 116 Tax Notes 887 (2007) Gilmore v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:37 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eugene Volokh at The Volokh Conspiracy comments on the Eleventh Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:44 am
United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935) on how Congress could not delegate its legislative authority to the President (Roosevelt - Franklin, not Teddy.) [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:09 am by Jeremy Telman
By Peter Greenberg - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0 Writing as I do from Oklahoma, home state to the Bob Dylan Archive, Levy v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am by Sasha Volokh
For instance, a state government can't delegate to a church the power to veto the licensing of a bar—that's the doctrine of Larkin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:57 am by Colby Pastre
Supreme Court’s recent decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court can be expected to address how its Wal-Mart and Comcast decisions–both arising under Rule 23–apply to FLSA collective actions as well as state law wage and hour class actions. [read post]