Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH" Results 2621 - 2640 of 2,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2020, 1:01 am by Josh Blackman
As the Chief Justice recently said in response to threatening statements made by a United States Senator about Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, such statements "are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am by jonathanturley
Many continue to assert that the adoption of a constitutional interpretation that they oppose is, as stated by Rep. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:32 am by Mike Scarcella
Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause ruling in June in Bullcoming v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 2:53 am by Michael Ehline
Until now, the abortion law being practiced in the United States is the Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
The majority applied the Court’s recent New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by James Romoser
When we asked it to name three noteworthy opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Question #11), it started off strong: It identified (and correctly summarized) her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
That both the United States and Israel are wrestling with these fundamental questions makes this an opportune time to revisit them. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Franks’ book was going to press, the Supreme Court granted cert in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am by Josh Blackman
Ct. 2603, 2614 (2020) (Kavanaugh, J., dissenting) (quoting Lukumi, 508 U.S. at 537–38). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that by agreeing to hear the New York gun case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am by SHG
Ct. 1683, 1689 n.2 (2020); see also United States v. [read post]