Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Separation of Church and State? [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
The three most recent full trials are Hughes v Risbridger (2010 EWHC 491 (QB)) Berezovsky v Russian Television (10 March 2010 EWHC 476 (QB)) and Gary Flood v Times Newspapers (16 October 2009 EWHC 2375 (QB)). [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The following day Lord Neuberger MR dismissed the claimant’s application for permission to appeal and the programme was subsequently broadcast. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Minn. 1999) (granting summary judgment); Broussard by Lord v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:32 pm
Now it is over, the case of the Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Limited must stand as a monument to the newspaper group’s extraordinary capacity to deny reality. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:19 am
” This is a truly astonishing state of affairs. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am
Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill was read the third time in the House of Lords on Thursday. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was `the best that the nature of the case will allow’. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
According to Caterpillar,despite the requirement laid down by the Court of Appeal in Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 and Roger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis (1987) ICR 464 that the confidential information be identified, the court could still apply the principle established by the House of Lords in Bolkiah v KPMG [1998] UKHL 52 that an ex-employee can be barred from carrying out specified work for a new employer unless that employee is able to… [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
Nonetheless, Cases like Terre Neuve Sarl v Yewdale Ltd [2020] and Etihad Airways PJSC v Flother [2020] reveal complexities in ascertaining commercial expectations and business efficacy. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:25 pm
In parallel the House of Lords Communications Committee is conducting an inquiry on internet regulation, including intermediary liability. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
A familiar sight for lawyersinvolved in TVCatchup suitsITV Broadcasting Limited, ITV 2 Limited, ITV Digital Channels Limited, Channel Four Television Corporation, 4 Ventures Limited, Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited and ITV Studios Limited v TVCatchup Limited (in administration), TVCatchup (UK) Limited and Media Resources Limited (a Mauritian company) [2015] EWCA Civ 204 is the latest development in the long-running copyright litigation saga which is usually known by its shorter name of ITV… [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 3:37 am
The state of play in the UK courts Q1: Did the Aldi product take unfair advantage of the reputation of the Thatchers mark? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
Wilkinson stated that as a result of Lord Marland's experience, specifically citing his experience with Hunter Boots, he has a "real grip of what managing IP is like" and he understands "how, it is felt, expensive it is to develop a good IP strategy especially for an international company". [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
Wilkinson stated that as a result of Lord Marland's experience, specifically citing his experience with Hunter Boots, he has a "real grip of what managing IP is like" and he understands "how, it is felt, expensive it is to develop a good IP strategy especially for an international company". [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am
Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am
Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
