Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2006, 1:06 am
A comment in IPKat has a link to the ruling for Baigent v Random House [2006] EWHC 719 (Ch). [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:43 pm
Hinton and State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:34 pm
Arrest and Summons v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 12:00 am
In the case of Sayers v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
Paul Ramirez (NU)• Evelyn Atkinson (University of Chicago), "The Right to Bodily Integrity: Pratt v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
Constitution, and that Duka therefore had established a likelihood of success on the merits of her case (Duka v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:21 am
In Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 7:19 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Georgia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:16 am
" But there is a "but" - this rule states "but see" I.O.P. 7 which provides that in section 2, that "[u]nder the law of this circuit, published opinions are binding precedent" and cites to Martin v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 9:08 am
The case, Alt v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 12:33 pm
The grant-funded California Restraint Safety Education and Training (CARSEAT) V campaign is aimed at improving child passenger safety throughout the state. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
The question presented in The Standard Register Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:11 pm
The state brief stressed in particular the part of the main opinion by the Justices in the Baze case that indicated how difficult it would be for inmates in other states to get delays of their executions based on new challenges to the lethal injection method. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:45 am
Gibbons v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
This is for two main reasons. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 5:07 am
See State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:22 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Robert Glicksman analyzes last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:20 pm
I will be speaking on due process and Sackett v. [read post]
