Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 44,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
* Although the custodian of the records or documents requested may, as a matter of an exercise of discretion, elect to deny access to documents and records that are within the ambit of the several exceptions to disclosure authorized by FOIL, as the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
* Although the custodian of the records or documents requested may, as a matter of an exercise of discretion, elect to deny access to documents and records that are within the ambit of the several exceptions to disclosure authorized by FOIL, as the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:32 pm
The next day, the parties put the settlement on the record of $15,000 per plaintiff. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:37 am
After months of procedural wrangling, the merits at last have been joined in Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:38 pm
Citing United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:16 am
The State appealed. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:10 am
When designating the horse as New Jersey’s state animal in 1977 Governor Bryne said: “The founding fathers of our state thought so highly of the horse that they included it in our state seal. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:03 am
Executive Office for United States AttorneysDocket: 10-1510Issue(s): Whether the government can refuse to disclose records by invoking an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2004, 10:49 am
Read State Farm v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:15 am
Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:39 am
In the case of Sackett v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 5:57 am
Liounis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 9:45 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 8:05 am
In Doe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:08 pm
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] to determine, "[w]hether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 11:12 am
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] that it will not release video recordings from Perry v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Capitol Records v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
On March 8, 2012, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted cert in Jacqueline Tamman v. [read post]
