Search for: "State v. Stevens" Results 2621 - 2640 of 7,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2010, 12:13 pm by Erin Miller
Below, Tiffany Cartwright, a student at Stanford Law School, analyzes the opinion in Wood v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm by emp
” The next case of 2010, Stevens v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 10:34 pm
This debate happened to come just a few days after I taught Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
At Opinio Juris, Heather Cohen looks at Jesner v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion for an 8-1 Court. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, the “one person, one vote” challenge to the state legislative maps in Texas, comes from Marcia Coyle for the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required) and Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, with commentary from David Gans at New Republic, Steven Mazie at The Economist, and Rick Hasen in the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Full protection, except for historically recognized exceptions: The Court’s decision last year in Stevens v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm by Steven Calabresi
  Steven Gow Calabresi, Elise Kostial, Gary Lawson, What McCulloch v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 8:27 am
Yesterday an amended verified complaint was filed in Charney v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
Representing the petitioners in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
Wolf gives any evidence of having read, even while stating my opinions for me), and I did not conflate them in my interview with Ms. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Rodger Citron reviews the late Justice John Paul Stevens’ memoir, noting that “Stevens’s grace is on display throughout the entire book. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens, the Court held that the FCA does not authorize qui tam actions against state defendants. [read post]