Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2011, 4:06 pm
"While not necessarily related to the internet, a story out of Florida merits inclusion here due to its strong link to the privacy/public security debate in the technological context. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:08 am
United States, 293 F 1013 (D.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:53 am
"Recognized" by the state as a mulatto? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:40 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that “The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that "The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law … [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm
State v Casillas. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
The prosecution should not necessarily be able to introduce the letter in its case in chief, but the state should pay for relocation of or a security detail for these key witnesses. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:58 am
” Art 24 reflects situations where there is an especially strong and fixed connection between the subject matter of a dispute and the courts of a particular member state. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:32 am
The Fourth Circuit has stated the rule this way: “The Act's language obviously indicates a strong congressional preference for mainstreaming. [read post]
24 May 2017, 11:11 am
The Fourth Circuit has stated the rule this way: “The Act's language obviously indicates a strong congressional preference for mainstreaming. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:04 pm
In Meda v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:16 am
Free speechCouncil 82 [ex rel Kuhnel], v State of New York, App. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
The Fourth Department said that "PERB abused its discretion in expanding a public employee's rights to include the right to have a union representative present during a criminal investigation" as New York State "has a strong public policy that prohibits union interference with criminal investigations. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
Supreme Court asked the acting solicitor general to file an amicus brief in the case American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:05 pm
Joe Dreitler is a bona fide trademark expert, and he has strong views on the Lanham Act's "use" requirement and the TTAB's fraud doctrine. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:45 pm
Today’s roundup brings us a series of strong posts from a few of the Network’s best class action bloggers: Andrew Trask, Russell Jackson and Sean Wajert. [read post]
