Search for: "Supreme Court of New Mexico" Results 2621 - 2640 of 4,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 9:01 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Chesney over at Lawfare notes that the Mexican Supreme Court has ruled that civilian trials are required in some cases of misconduct by military members. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:28 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The Supreme Court most recently considered all of these issues in Holder v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:04 am by Robert Chesney
 There has been talk of reform for a few years now, however, and now comes a ruling from Mexico’s Supreme Court apparently requiring civilian trials in at least some such cases. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 3:07 am by SHG
  The title chapter, the story of Supreme Court Association Justice Ed Tuttle's sex life and aspirations on vacation (how exactly does a Supreme Court justice, vacationing in Jackson, Wyoming, prove to hot chicks and roadies he really is a judge?) [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:06 am by Dharmendra Chatur
As we may know the problem of black money has plagued India  in recent times, with the Supreme Court even going to the extent of ordering a Special Investigative Team to look into the black money issue in the Ram Jethmalani case. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:06 am by Dharmendra Chatur
As we may know the problem of black money has plagued India  in recent times, with the Supreme Court even going to the extent of ordering a Special Investigative Team to look into the black money issue in the Ram Jethmalani case. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:34 pm by Steve Hall
The New Mexico Supreme Court passed off the hot potato both times by deciding not to decide and left unsettled one of the legal wrinkles left in the wake of the Legislature’s 2009 death penalty repeal. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm by Susan Brenner
Mailman, 148 N.M. 702, 242 P.3d 269 (New Mexico Supreme Court 2010). [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:50 am by immigrationprof
From Fox News Latino: The Florida Board of Bar Examiners says that an undocumented immigrant born in Mexico appears to qualify for a law license, but it still wants an advisory opinion from the state Supreme Court before making a... [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
New Mexico, and again for the decision in Williams v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:02 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"The science of eyewitness memoryWired magazine has a discussion of the subject reacting to new jury instructions issued July 19 by New Jersey’s Supreme Court Poor Mexico: So far from God ... [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:39 am by Joel R. Brandes
Under these facts, even if the parties had a shared intention to someday return to the United States, they effectively abandoned their prior residence in that country and established a new one in Mexico. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  In a series of cases since 1990, the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit have concluded this is a taking of the landowner’s right to unencumbered title and possession of their land, and that the Fifth Amendment requires the federal government to pay just compensation. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Previously, I have noted that polygraph test results are inadmissible in every United States jurisdiction except New Mexico barring a prior stipulation by both parties. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:57 pm by Legal Profession
The New Mexico Supreme Court has reversed a decision of the Court of Appeals that rejected a defendant's claimed violation of his... [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Eva Arevuo
While many voter ID laws are being widely discussed at the moment, especially with a Supreme Court review of the Voting Rights Act looming, the argument about felon rights and the status of African Americans in the criminal justice system is fairly silent. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:14 am by Viking
The Criminal Rules Enabling Act, Max Minzner,  University of New Mexico School of Law July 10, 2012 46 University of Richmond Law Review 1047 (2012) Abstract: The Rules Enabling Act authorizes the Supreme Court to prescribe “general rules of practice and procedure” as long as those rules do not “abridge, enlarge or modify” any substantive right. [read post]