Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
That doesn’t make the measure bad or unconstitutional (most intra-state reorganizations are valid, as the Supreme Court made clear last Term in the Schuette v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
MacKinnon v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
It is not realistic that people buying what is essentially a consumer product or small business tool will be able to fill in the detailed applications required for a SFOC, described above, or an exemption application in the US. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:27 pm
Quite another for it to simply make stuff up. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:29 am
Olde Belhaven, in the case of Shadowood Condominium Association v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:01 pm
Time Warner (Catch-up Post) Court Says Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Pursue Failure-to-Purge Claim Under the VPPA – Sterk v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
http://t.co/KNPjuQRLqP -> Creation Is Not Its Own Reward http://t.co/OWMQeSUidR -> Dish Wins Tentative Ruling Over Fox in AutoHop Litigation http://t.co/LvwuryigKX -> Google Tests New Ads Aimed at Reducing Content Piracy http://t.co/YEwae3a3FE -> Dotcom's claims don't have 'an air of reality' http://t.co/yV6MAcV2LC -> Courts Weigh in on the Protection of Software Code http://t.co/xhvO0u9KGt -> Google Makes It Easy to Illegally Download 60% of… [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
What happens when you don’t have certain kinds of protections? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 2:10 pm
Real example: if I take a wallet and fake up an expensive LV emblem, and stitch “fake” all over it, so no consumer would be confused, the gov’t says that’s criminal counterfeiting. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:40 pm
We couldn’t agree more. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 1:48 pm
See, Gomez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
It’s Auntie BBC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
The State alleged MPHJ engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices under the Vermont Consumer Protection Act [...].The State filed this case seeking [...] relief under state law. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:27 pm
Even before the landmark United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
The ITC is most appropriate for consumer goods. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
CaroniaCommercial Speech Protection Is Not That Dumb First Amendment protection of commercial speech generally is not at odds with consumer protection. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 pm
In Sorrell v. [read post]
