Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 11,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2020, 10:48 am
District Court for the Eastern and Northern Districts of California at this link. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
Generally speaking, state governments can't bar people from entering a state, or for that matter traveling within the state. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:39 am
United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:05 pm
Becerra an active member of the Bar for those five years? [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
In a published opinion filed March 24, 2020, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Division One) reversed a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, entered by the San Diego County Superior Court after sustaining a demurrer without leave on statute of limitations grounds to a group’s action challenging the CEQA review for Caltrans’ Interstate 5 (I-5)/State Route 56 (SR 56) freeway interchange project (the “Project”). [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
California, 19-532 Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:10 am
Law enforcement officials can use California health and safety codes for enforcement of the order. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:55 am
— Texas Bar Blog California law students push to skip bar exam during pandemic — Dozens of anxious law students flooded an emergency phone meeting of the California Committee of Bar Examiners on Monday to beg for automatic admission to the bar rather than face the uncertainty of a postponed exam. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
While this article will primarily consider SLLCs within Texas, it is worth nothing that California among few other states, while not allowing for a domestic version of the SLLC, will still permit foreign SLLCs to operate as such within their borders. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
To recognise and enforce a foreign judgment requires a procedure before the Supreme Court, but does not require an examination of the merits. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 12:12 pm
State Department; Nick Schifrin, Foreign Affairs Correspondent for PBS NewsHour. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am
The government asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on whether a final judgment in favor of the United States in a lawsuit brought under the FTCA, on the ground that a private individual could not be held liable in the same circumstances, bars a claim against a government employee based on Bivens v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 7:46 am
— Texas Bar Blog Judicial Branch posts YouTube channel directory — The Texas Judicial Branch published a YouTube channel directory listing of courts convening via Zoom. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 7:02 am
According to the California appellate court, whose ruling against LegalMatch.com the California Supreme Court summarily upheld (i.e., without an opinion) on March 11, 2020, this was how LegalMatch.com worked: “LegalMatch sends information to lawyers based solely on the client’s selection of geographic location and area of expertise. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:09 am
Supreme Court, the 13 U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Por: Lcdo. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
Let’s see if we can help navigate the current state of the law in California. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
State Water Resources (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 342, 359; Bridges v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 11:42 am
… TIKD was accused of violating legal “ethics” by a law firm that specializes in traffic ticket defense, and then by the Florida State Bar. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 11:42 am
… Bearing in mind that the stated purpose of legal “ethics” rules enforced by state bar authorities is to protect the public from abuse or fraud at the hands of lawyers, consider the legal profession’s response to TIKD’s offering. [read post]
