Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA" Results 2621 - 2640 of 6,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2020, 8:44 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The United States Supreme Court has held that Title VII is not “a general civility code for the American workplace. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees "an individual right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:12 pm by Joel R. Brandes
          The Court rejected de Loera’s argument that the children’s country of habitual residence should be the United States, based on the family’s short-lived plan to relocate to Florida. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
District Court took up a loose end left by the Supreme Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:00 pm by Cicely Wilson
Remanded.Read more: Top state court says woman who donated egg to female partner has parental rightsState v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 6:45 am by Gene Quinn
Foreign Patent Owners Safe From Declaratory JudgmentIn a decision that is simply painful to read, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday decided in Autogenomics v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
 The Supreme Court of the United States only hears a limited number of cases --- and rarely issues of family law. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:34 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Florida (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act – Good Faith Negotiations) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlWhite v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 6:40 am by Mavrick Law Firm
” The FAA does not expressly state this rule, however, United States Supreme Court precedent has made it clear that “piecemeal” dispute resolution is necessary when parties have both arbitrable and non-arbitrable claims. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
Thus, it has been held that collecting information about the movement of a vehicle on public thoroughfares by means of an electronic device attached to a vehicle's undercarriage, which does not damage the vehicle or invade its interior, does not constitute a search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment (see United States v Knotts, 460 U.S. at 281-282; United States v McIver, 186 F3d 1119, 1126-1127 [9th Cir 1999], cert denied 528… [read post]