Search for: "US LEGALIZATION INC." Results 2621 - 2640 of 29,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 6:30 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Alberta Court held that the 2007 decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Maple Raiders Inc. v Eagle Sheet Metal Inc. had decided the issue. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:24 am
Unbelievably, USA Trademark Enterprises even sent a notice to us when we registered our firm’s logo. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Paula Black
Many of us have… which is, why when I read the article by Minda Zetlin, an Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:01 am
February 17, 2022 - 1 PM: ARSA Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
The Christensen Firm's retainer agreement specifies a flat fee of $250,000; Shapiro testified that he told Laing and Laing's associates that Laing's legal fees 'could run a million dollars.'"Duffel bags full of cash. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:11 pm by Jonathan L. Israel
 The "Giant Rat" -- the monster inflatable notoriously associated with labor union activity -- has survived another legal challenge. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:16 am by The Recorder
[Amy Miller] When Netapp, Inc. needed a new top lawyer to replace Andy Kryder, who retired after serving as general counsel for 10 years, it didn’t have to look far. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:59 am by Steven Cohen
  In addition, the court rules that these opinions would not assist the trier of fact as he did not explain how he used the evidence to come to his conclusions. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:03 am by Brent Lorentz
  Intellectual property rights are, in essence, legalized monopolies. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
This Kat recently had an opportunity revisit the patent decision given by the United States Supreme Court on 20 March in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
The trial court must measure the usefulness of the evidence against its cost, and if the cost outweighs the usefulness, then the evidence is not legally relevant, and the court should exclude it. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:29 am
  In this particular case,  ConnectU Inc. v. [read post]